RelicRELIC
Compare

Relic vs CopyQ

CopyQ is the power user’s clipboard manager: cross-platform, scriptable, and endlessly customizable. Relic trades that depth for encrypted sync and a simpler everyday feel. Here is an honest, fair comparison.

Quick answer
CopyQ is a free, open-source clipboard manager that runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux today, with tabs, scripting, and optional per-tab GnuPG encryption. Relic skips the scripting in favor of automatic end-to-end encryption with XChaCha20-Poly1305 and Argon2id, built-in cross-device sync, and a permanent history out of the box. Pick CopyQ if you want deep customization and local control across desktops now. Pick Relic if you want encrypted sync that just works.

CopyQ is a remarkable piece of free, open-source software. It runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux, organizes your history into tabs, and can be scripted to do almost anything you can imagine, from custom commands to automated transforms on what you copy. If you want a clipboard manager you can bend to your exact workflow, nothing here beats it, and we respect that.

Relic comes at the problem from the opposite direction. Instead of maximum power and configuration, it aims for a clean default experience that keeps everything forever, encrypts it so only you can read it, and syncs it across your devices without you scripting anything. Both are cross-platform in spirit, but they feel very different to live with.

At a glance

RelicCopyQ
Keeps everythingYesYes
SearchYesYes
Syncs across devicesYesNo
Works on WindowsYesYes
Works on MacYesYes
Works on LinuxX11Yes
Works on phonePartialNo
End-to-end encryptedYesPartial
Open sourcePartialYes
Free tierYesYes

Two fair notes. CopyQ can encrypt individual tabs with a GnuPG plugin, so it is not a flat no on encryption, but it is opt-in per tab rather than automatic end-to-end encrypted sync. And Relic’s Linux desktop app is built for X11, where CopyQ also runs happily on Wayland. Mobile is browse-and-search only. More below.

When CopyQ is the better pick

For power users and tinkerers, CopyQ is often the right answer, and here is when.

  • You want maximum control.CopyQ’s scripting and commands let you automate and customize far beyond what Relic exposes. If you love building your own workflow, this is your tool.
  • You need it on Linux today.CopyQ already runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux. Relic’s Linux desktop is still coming.
  • You want free, open source, and offline. CopyQ is fully open source and runs entirely locally, with no account and no cloud involved.
  • You like organizing with tabs.CopyQ’s tabbed history is great for separating different kinds of content, and you can encrypt sensitive tabs with the GnuPG plugin.

When Relic is the better pick

Relic wins when you want encrypted sync and a simple default experience without assembling it yourself.

  • You want sync that just works. CopyQ has no built-in encrypted cloud sync. Relic syncs your history across devices out of the box, with no scripting or shared folders to wire up.
  • You want encryption on by default.Relic encrypts every item on device with XChaCha20-Poly1305 and Argon2id and stores only ciphertext we cannot read. CopyQ’s encryption is an optional, per-tab plugin rather than the default for everything.
  • You want simple, not a toolkit. CopyQ is powerful but has a steep learning curve. Relic is built to be useful the moment you install it.
  • You want screenshot search and a phone lens. Relic runs OCR on device and offers a browse-and-search lens on mobile so you can reach your history from your phone.

In fairness: Relic runs on Windows, the Mac and Linux today, but its Linux build wants an X11 session for its hotkey and paste-back, so on a Wayland desktop CopyQ still has the wider footprint. On phones, Relic is a browse-and-search lens rather than a background recorder, because phone operating systems block background clipboard capture. And Relic never writes to your clipboard on its own. It only puts something back when you pick it.

Short version: choose CopyQ if you want maximum power, scripting, and local control across desktops. Choose Relic if you want encrypted sync, a permanent history, and a simple experience that works the moment you open it.

FAQ

Is CopyQ free?

Yes. CopyQ is free and open source, and it runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux. It is probably the most powerful clipboard manager out there, with tabs, scripting, and deep customization. Relic has a free tier too, plus an optional Pro plan around 4 to 5 dollars a month.

Can CopyQ sync across my devices?

Not in the way Relic does. CopyQ is local and does not include built-in encrypted cloud sync. People sometimes script their own sync or point it at a synced folder, but there is no turnkey cross-device feature. Relic is built around encrypted sync out of the box.

Is CopyQ encrypted?

CopyQ has an optional plugin that can encrypt individual tabs using GnuPG, which is genuinely useful. It is not the same as automatic end-to-end encrypted sync, though. Relic encrypts every item on your device with XChaCha20-Poly1305 and Argon2id by default and stores only ciphertext.

Which is more powerful?

CopyQ, without question, if you measure power by scripting and customization. You can automate almost anything with it. Relic deliberately trades that depth for a simpler everyday experience, encrypted sync, and a permanent history. It depends on whether you want a toolkit or an appliance.

Keep reading
What is a clipboard manager?
the full guide
Relic vs Ditto
the Windows classic
Relic vs Maccy
the Mac favorite
Relic vs Paste
the polished Apple pick
Copy and paste in the terminal
Ctrl+Shift+C and friends
How to copy a file path
across platforms
JSON formatter
tidy up copied JSON
Base64 encode/decode
convert on the fly